At the beginning of all local politicians are always very busy. It is the national budget to advise in the groups and to seek ways to improve this to detect errors, to eliminate useless and promote meaningful. But
are really busy all the local politicians that? No, a small group of people CDU has already thrown in the towel and surrendered to the draft budget 2011, the City Statute Radevormwald:
"We see no possibilities for changes in the budget estimates and no room to big savings. So we do without a large budget discussion. This is the first time for us." (Quote from the CDU-city Christian Association chairman Viebach after the Bergische Morgenpost 02.09.2011)
The Alternative List (AL) but it wants to know more. From 10 to 17 clock, the assets of the AL came in the sports school Jahnstraße on Kollenberg to get together in the budget proposal to read to find, despite all the difficulties, requires further explanation in the budget planning for this in the interest of citizens in the bodies to make discussion.
In http://www.radevormwald.de/ , the website of the city Radevormwald, I have done nothing to "Design the Financial Statutes 2011" found that all citizens can read. While performing other communities open processes that involve citizens in budgeting, refers to advice Radevormwald instead of just behind the doors of the groups. Anyone who may have registered with Twitter as I follow this info page on the topic: http://twitter.com/buergerhaushalt .
This is not just the style of the household is a prime example of transparency, but even the action Radevormwald the city. Why can ordinary people are really like! Envy, one can look to time to Tunisia and Egypt! Hopefully get the more durable democracy, as it is granted us by our acute oligarchs.
How much is the life we really Ness? In the budget that can not be found directly, as the cost of this investment ruins are spread over many items and only for insiders than control spendthrift finance the Paradise Garden of Eden recognizable (Foreign: The managing director of the bath is Mr. Eden). This puts the city, continued by Mayor Dr. Korsten tradition, a fool of the citizens in the nose! This, together with the majority groups in the Council stated that the GmbH law prohibits more transparency! This statement may have been expressed only as an end to incompetence or a lie!
One has only once under this Act by looking at Wikipedia, and then you can read that the members may decide to secrecy, but have done so in no way !!!!. From the leisure pool and the Fittneshölle Life Ness but the city is the sole shareholder. And it tolerates the Council majority, the Dr. Korsten like an absolute king must decide what must we all. Too bad that not all of it paid, but all of us with our tax money. This Transparency is likely to be expensive. Because of the baths-GmbH include 50.1% of Stadtwerke Radevormwald. Stalled it in the mother and economists have in mind the lack of transparency, it is logical to give them to the public utility a poor ranking in credit conditions. The result would be that our public utilities, any investment would have to pay a lot more expensive than other firms, which operate independently without such a sick parent. whether it is so I do not know! but as given to the secrecy is worth so much, one must assume that it is so. With sound financial position would be that's all not really necessary. And you can be sure that economic knowledgeable of it the corresponding do something.
But back to the budget:
Even local politicians are amateurs. However, they are overwhelmed with the household with a tsunami of qualified and experienced reefs and Official German. Why the household has no glossary is provided that explains all these terms?
Also on the sides of each budget item is often a lot of space. Could it not be often times explains why certain figures and certain changes are foreseen?
Why there is no register with information on which pages to certain equipment the funds available?
Why is not even a list of the largest budget items are prepared, that you can see the priorities of the city. This list should be divided into the tasks, where the city has only enough funding from other sources dutifully continue and the issues that may decide the city council from its own discretion.
Why is not the average, how much load each cost center was average in the last 5 years? It would be interesting to see how much each household item approach differs from such a 20 011 average for the years 2004 to 2009.
Indeed, it is striking that in a number of financial tables, the result of 2009 is lower than the approach of 2010 (results for 2010 are not yet well!). But if you the budget from last year (2010) will add, can be found for the same cost center, the same game. 2008, a low yield is registered, but to exceed the projections for 2010 and 2011 by far. Here, then systematically artificially high cost centers are created, although the real income is often repeated many times, up to 40 times below that? Why such a procedure and what happens to the money, which is scheduled for the post, but is so real never used there?
multiple missing in the current budget proposal, the results for 2009, although there was for the respective items of an approach. What happened? If because nothing would have been issued, as are but a zero if there is nothing but raises the questions.
is interesting on page 175 is an obvious typo. Instead of € 700,000 for gas because only 700 € are given. It seems as if this amount is also expected to continue. Therefore missing from the budget so well 700,000 euros. However, should the city a more competitive gas suppliers have found it certainly on the question of why this does not tell us that.
often quite large amounts under "other" or other name would be indifferent as not appropriate footnotes to what map it is not adjustable in which for the reader These cost centers?
Since we have not managed much to go through the entire household, this list is far from complete. It would be good if all groups concerned again intensively with the budget.
The AL finds himself unable this concoction with current knowledge to agree. A budget should be as clearly disclose where money is needed and identifying what is spent where. If this balance is not technically possible because holding a real source of cost is budgeted financially for many codes, this should be explained by annexes to the budget. The AL can under the circumstances and no tax increases Agree because they can not determine whether the extra money is invested in a sustainable for our future or whether it is burned up in the known control devices more destruction.
the afternoon was preferred to advise the Social Committee. This too shows that the subject budget for the policy should be kept small. Since all the possible agenda of presentations to be introduced without subsequent decision before it comes to financial advice. It is the goal of the politicians to get tired so much with other issues that then for the treatment of the household is no longer interested?
All this is my personal account and my personal Score of today's meeting. Not all the ideas expressed come from the meeting, since you also typing yet reached a conclusion. But I hereby want the people in Radevormwald the possibility, of what's up and running again, to gain knowledge. Please, many people here on this text, copy the link to the topic and send it to everyone you know
The AL will meet to plan every two weeks on Wednesday evening, according to the agreement at 19.30 or 20 clock.
On 16/02/2011, at the House Castle Street 8 clock at 10.30 the next Group meeting. Topics include the upcoming meetings and further discussion of the draft budget.
contact with the AL: http://www.al-rade.de/contact or convoluted web mail at the above address by me.
The meeting schedule of the city Radevormwald: http://www.radevormwald.de/cms222/rat_verwaltung/stadtrat_ausschuesse/termine/index.shtml
The public part of the agenda was a good week before the committee meeting under "News" Posted twittering and the rule of mine: http://twitter.com/FJStaratschek
are really busy all the local politicians that? No, a small group of people CDU has already thrown in the towel and surrendered to the draft budget 2011, the City Statute Radevormwald:
"We see no possibilities for changes in the budget estimates and no room to big savings. So we do without a large budget discussion. This is the first time for us." (Quote from the CDU-city Christian Association chairman Viebach after the Bergische Morgenpost 02.09.2011)
The Alternative List (AL) but it wants to know more. From 10 to 17 clock, the assets of the AL came in the sports school Jahnstraße on Kollenberg to get together in the budget proposal to read to find, despite all the difficulties, requires further explanation in the budget planning for this in the interest of citizens in the bodies to make discussion.
In http://www.radevormwald.de/ , the website of the city Radevormwald, I have done nothing to "Design the Financial Statutes 2011" found that all citizens can read. While performing other communities open processes that involve citizens in budgeting, refers to advice Radevormwald instead of just behind the doors of the groups. Anyone who may have registered with Twitter as I follow this info page on the topic: http://twitter.com/buergerhaushalt .
This is not just the style of the household is a prime example of transparency, but even the action Radevormwald the city. Why can ordinary people are really like! Envy, one can look to time to Tunisia and Egypt! Hopefully get the more durable democracy, as it is granted us by our acute oligarchs.
How much is the life we really Ness? In the budget that can not be found directly, as the cost of this investment ruins are spread over many items and only for insiders than control spendthrift finance the Paradise Garden of Eden recognizable (Foreign: The managing director of the bath is Mr. Eden). This puts the city, continued by Mayor Dr. Korsten tradition, a fool of the citizens in the nose! This, together with the majority groups in the Council stated that the GmbH law prohibits more transparency! This statement may have been expressed only as an end to incompetence or a lie!
One has only once under this Act by looking at Wikipedia, and then you can read that the members may decide to secrecy, but have done so in no way !!!!. From the leisure pool and the Fittneshölle Life Ness but the city is the sole shareholder. And it tolerates the Council majority, the Dr. Korsten like an absolute king must decide what must we all. Too bad that not all of it paid, but all of us with our tax money. This Transparency is likely to be expensive. Because of the baths-GmbH include 50.1% of Stadtwerke Radevormwald. Stalled it in the mother and economists have in mind the lack of transparency, it is logical to give them to the public utility a poor ranking in credit conditions. The result would be that our public utilities, any investment would have to pay a lot more expensive than other firms, which operate independently without such a sick parent. whether it is so I do not know! but as given to the secrecy is worth so much, one must assume that it is so. With sound financial position would be that's all not really necessary. And you can be sure that economic knowledgeable of it the corresponding do something.
But back to the budget:
Even local politicians are amateurs. However, they are overwhelmed with the household with a tsunami of qualified and experienced reefs and Official German. Why the household has no glossary is provided that explains all these terms?
Also on the sides of each budget item is often a lot of space. Could it not be often times explains why certain figures and certain changes are foreseen?
Why there is no register with information on which pages to certain equipment the funds available?
Why is not even a list of the largest budget items are prepared, that you can see the priorities of the city. This list should be divided into the tasks, where the city has only enough funding from other sources dutifully continue and the issues that may decide the city council from its own discretion.
Why is not the average, how much load each cost center was average in the last 5 years? It would be interesting to see how much each household item approach differs from such a 20 011 average for the years 2004 to 2009.
Indeed, it is striking that in a number of financial tables, the result of 2009 is lower than the approach of 2010 (results for 2010 are not yet well!). But if you the budget from last year (2010) will add, can be found for the same cost center, the same game. 2008, a low yield is registered, but to exceed the projections for 2010 and 2011 by far. Here, then systematically artificially high cost centers are created, although the real income is often repeated many times, up to 40 times below that? Why such a procedure and what happens to the money, which is scheduled for the post, but is so real never used there?
multiple missing in the current budget proposal, the results for 2009, although there was for the respective items of an approach. What happened? If because nothing would have been issued, as are but a zero if there is nothing but raises the questions.
is interesting on page 175 is an obvious typo. Instead of € 700,000 for gas because only 700 € are given. It seems as if this amount is also expected to continue. Therefore missing from the budget so well 700,000 euros. However, should the city a more competitive gas suppliers have found it certainly on the question of why this does not tell us that.
often quite large amounts under "other" or other name would be indifferent as not appropriate footnotes to what map it is not adjustable in which for the reader These cost centers?
Since we have not managed much to go through the entire household, this list is far from complete. It would be good if all groups concerned again intensively with the budget.
The AL finds himself unable this concoction with current knowledge to agree. A budget should be as clearly disclose where money is needed and identifying what is spent where. If this balance is not technically possible because holding a real source of cost is budgeted financially for many codes, this should be explained by annexes to the budget. The AL can under the circumstances and no tax increases Agree because they can not determine whether the extra money is invested in a sustainable for our future or whether it is burned up in the known control devices more destruction.
the afternoon was preferred to advise the Social Committee. This too shows that the subject budget for the policy should be kept small. Since all the possible agenda of presentations to be introduced without subsequent decision before it comes to financial advice. It is the goal of the politicians to get tired so much with other issues that then for the treatment of the household is no longer interested?
All this is my personal account and my personal Score of today's meeting. Not all the ideas expressed come from the meeting, since you also typing yet reached a conclusion. But I hereby want the people in Radevormwald the possibility, of what's up and running again, to gain knowledge. Please, many people here on this text, copy the link to the topic and send it to everyone you know
The AL will meet to plan every two weeks on Wednesday evening, according to the agreement at 19.30 or 20 clock.
On 16/02/2011, at the House Castle Street 8 clock at 10.30 the next Group meeting. Topics include the upcoming meetings and further discussion of the draft budget.
contact with the AL: http://www.al-rade.de/contact or convoluted web mail at the above address by me.
The meeting schedule of the city Radevormwald: http://www.radevormwald.de/cms222/rat_verwaltung/stadtrat_ausschuesse/termine/index.shtml
The public part of the agenda was a good week before the committee meeting under "News" Posted twittering and the rule of mine: http://twitter.com/FJStaratschek
0 comments:
Post a Comment